THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY

From Logical Necessity to Physical Possibility

The Theory of Objectivity (TO) is an independent research program developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva to investigate the fundamental conditions required for the existence, differentiation, relation, organization, and continuity of the universe.

Its central question is prior to the description of any particular physical phenomenon:

What conditions must necessarily be satisfied for an existential universe to be possible at all?

Rather than beginning exclusively with already constituted matter, spacetime, fields, or measurable phenomena, the Theory of Objectivity begins with logical and ontological conditions and investigates whether a coherent path can be established from such conditions toward geometry, physical structure, cosmology, and experimentally examinable consequences.

Its general research path may be summarized as:

Logic → Ontology → Formal Geometry → Physical Model → Prediction → Test

The project therefore operates simultaneously as an investigation into the foundations of existence and as an attempt to determine whether those foundations can generate conditions for new developments in physics and cosmology

Modern physics has achieved extraordinary descriptive and predictive success. Yet several foundational questions remain open at the level of ontology and first principles.

 

Why is there an existential universe?

 

What is minimally required for one element to be distinguishable from another?

 

Can existence be meaningfully conceived without boundaries, relations, composition, or differentiation?

 

What conditions must precede the emergence of measurable physical phenomena?

 

Can the existence of structures, interactions, information, and observers ultimately be derived from more elementary logical requirements?

 

The Theory of Objectivity approaches these questions through a set of seven foundational propositions known as the Seven Absolute Truths.

 

These propositions constitute the axiomatic core of the theory.

 

They are not presented as experimental findings. They are formulated as propositions whose necessity is to be examined through logical, modal, geometric, and ontological analysis.

 

The subsequent scientific challenge is different: to determine whether consequences derived from these propositions can be translated into physical models, quantitative predictions, and empirical tests.

The Theory of Objectivity is structured around seven foundational propositions.

AT1 — Nothingness

The theory begins with Nothingness as a primitive logical-mathematical condition preceding constituted spacetime, matter, and physical phenomena.

Within TO, Nothingness is not merely a linguistic synonym for absolute absence. It functions as the initial logical condition from which the problem of differentiation, structure, and existence is investigated.

The theory further associates this primordial condition with the concept of the Perfect Logical Sphere, a formal geometric structure examined as part of the transition between logical minimum and differentiated existence.

AT2 — Individuality

Every element must possess a condition by which it can be distinguished from every other element.

TO investigates this requirement through the concept of an individualizing field or magnetic aura, understood within the theory as a condition associated with the uniqueness of an element.

The physical meaning and possible measurable counterparts of this proposition remain part of the research program.

AT3 — Infinity

The theory distinguishes Infinity from finite and structured elements.

Infinity is not treated simply as another element within the universe but as a necessary non-element or non-structure whose role must be distinguished from bounded existential entities.

AT4 — Boundary

Distinct elements require differentiation.

Accordingly, TO proposes that whenever two elements are genuinely distinct, some form of boundary condition must distinguish them.

Boundary is therefore treated not merely as a geometric accident but as a fundamental condition of structural distinction.

AT5 — Relation

Existence is not regarded as structurally isolated.

TO proposes that the existence of an element requires relational determination involving other elements.

The term observation, when used in this context, does not necessarily refer to human consciousness or sensory perception. It refers primarily to a structural relation through which elements become mutually determinate within an existential system.

AT6 — Composition

Every constituted element depends upon antecedent elements or prior structural conditions.

This principle introduces composition, succession, and structural ancestry into the ontology of the theory and plays a central role in its cosmogonic development.

AT7 — The Transcendent Element

TO proposes that an existential universe cannot be fully characterized only by immediately material structures.

In the current development of the theory, the transcendent element is identified with knowledge or information generated through atomic relations and regarded as equivalent, in the theoretical framework, to the radiations produced through those relations.

This proposition is central to the later stages of TO, particularly to its treatment of information, memory, intelligence, and cosmic development.

 

FROM AXIOMS TO PHYSICS

 

A fundamental methodological distinction governs the Theory of Objectivity.

 

A proposition may be necessary within an axiomatic system without thereby being experimentally demonstrated as a law of nature.

 

For this reason, TO distinguishes three levels of analysis:

 

T_TO — the logical-axiomatic system

 

The formal system containing the foundational propositions, definitions, logical relations, and derived theorems.

 

↓

 

M_TO — the ontological model

 

The structural interpretation developed from the axiomatic system.

 

↓

 

P_TO — the physical interpretation

 

The attempt to associate elements of the ontological model with measurable physical structures, processes, variables, and phenomena.

 

This distinction is essential.

 

Modal necessity is not empirical confirmation.

 

Likewise, conceptual compatibility between an experiment and a TO proposition is not sufficient to establish that the experiment confirms the theory.

 

One of the central objectives of the present research program is therefore to identify where logical necessity ends and specifically physical claims begin.

 

 

THE PERFECT LOGICAL SPHERE

 

Among the foundational structures investigated by TO is the Perfect Logical Sphere.

 

It is conceived as a formal geometric structure associated with the primordial logical condition preceding conventional physical organization.

 

Within the current formulation, the Perfect Logical Sphere is treated as a two-dimensional logical surface rather than as an ordinary material sphere with an interior volume. Its formal description includes a maximal circumference divided into 64 logical straight parts and a total surface organization of 2048 logical parts.

 

The structure is also considered in relation to an external field that distinguishes it from Infinity.

 

These characteristics belong to the internal geometric development of TO and must not automatically be identified with already established physical scales or particles.

 

Whether the Perfect Logical Sphere possesses a physically meaningful counterpart is a separate question that requires mathematical derivation and empirical investigation.

 

COSMOGONIC DEVELOPMENT

 

The Theory of Objectivity proposes that progressively more complex existential structures arise from relations among its foundational conditions.

 

Among the concepts used in this development are:

 

Expansive Inductive Effect — EIE

 

A process associated with boundary, relation, and the expansion of structural possibilities.

 

Reductive Inductive Effect — RIE

 

A process associated with boundary, relation, composition, and the formation or reorganization of structured elements.

 

Cosmogonic Theorem

 

The theoretical articulation through which the axiomatic principles are connected to the generation and transformation of existential structures.

 

Tempus Antagonicus

 

A concept associated with relational and transformational processes involving later axiomatic conditions within the cosmogonic framework.

 

Phenomenic Elements

 

Theoretical categories used to examine the emergence of phenomena such as temperature, light, sound, electricity, magnetism, electromagnetic processes, colors, thought, and other forms of organized manifestation.

 

COSMOLOGICAL ERAS

 

TO describes cosmic development through a sequence of theoretical eras.

 

These include:

 

The Antagonistic Era

 

The Era of Logical Tracks

 

The Era of Tertiary Plasma Logical Currents

 

The Centrifugal Era

 

The Era of Intelligence Units

 

These eras belong to the internal cosmological architecture of the Theory of Objectivity.

 

They should not automatically be treated as equivalents of the conventional chronological epochs of standard cosmology.

 

A major task of the research program is precisely to determine whether TO’s cosmological sequence can be mathematically related to known physical processes and observational constraints.

 

PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY

 

The Theory of Objectivity develops interpretations concerning several areas traditionally addressed by physics and cosmology.

 

Among them are:

 

gravity as a phenomenon associated with Convergence Zones;

 

the emergence of phenomenic elements;

 

atomic relations and radiation;

 

information as a structural component of the universe;

 

the relation between matter and transcendent information;

 

cosmogonic processes derived from inductive effects;

 

the formation of Memory Units and Intelligence Units;

 

and

 

the long-term structural evolution of the universe.

 

These proposals occupy different levels of theoretical maturity.

 

Some belong primarily to the ontological framework.

 

Others have provisional physical interpretations.

 

Still others require mathematical formulation before they can meaningfully be compared with experiment.

 

The website therefore identifies, whenever possible, the status of each proposition.

 

PREDICTIONS AND TESTS

 

A central objective of the current stage of the Theory of Objectivity is to move beyond broad compatibility with existing scientific results.

 

The decisive scientific question is not simply:

 

Can a known experiment be interpreted in a way that is compatible with TO?

 

The stronger question is:

 

What does TO predict that can distinguish it from competing physical descriptions?

 

For this reason, the research program seeks to develop explicit predictions containing, whenever possible:

 

a derived theoretical quantity;

 

a mathematical relation;

 

a measurable variable;

 

an experimental or observational system;

 

the TO prediction;

 

the corresponding conventional prediction;

 

a result favorable to the proposed TO interpretation;

 

and

 

a result capable of contradicting it.

 

The website will progressively organize such proposals within the Predictions and Tests section.

 

EXPERIMENTAL DIALOGUE

 

The Theory of Objectivity has been placed in critical-propositional dialogue with scientific studies in several areas, including:

 

quantum physics;

 

atomic physics;

 

quantum information;

 

electromagnetism;

 

vacuum phenomena;

 

gravitation;

 

cosmic topology;

 

and cosmology.

 

These studies are not all assigned the same epistemological status.

 

The project distinguishes at least four levels of relationship:

 

Conceptual Compatibility

 

A scientific result does not contradict a TO proposition and may resemble part of its conceptual structure.

 

Structural Analogy

 

A pattern identified in an experiment may resemble a relation proposed by TO without demonstrating that both arise from the same mechanism.

 

Empirical Constraint

 

An experiment places restrictions upon possible physical interpretations of TO.

 

Discriminating Test

 

A result is capable, at least in principle, of distinguishing a specific TO prediction from alternative models.

 

This classification is intended to prevent compatibility from being confused with corroboration.

 

CRITICISM AND OPEN QUESTIONS

 

The Theory of Objectivity is not presented as exempt from criticism.

 

Its development requires systematic examination of questions such as:

 

Are the foundational propositions genuinely independent?

 

Can their modal necessity be formally demonstrated?

 

Are the definitions sufficiently precise to avoid circularity?

 

Can the transition from ontology to physics be mathematically justified?

 

Can the theory generate quantitative predictions unavailable from existing models?

 

Are its physical interpretations compatible with established experimental constraints?

 

Which propositions belong to the formal core of TO and which remain hypotheses under development?

 

What observations could count against a specific physical interpretation of the theory?

 

The project therefore includes a dedicated Criticism and Dialogue section.

 

Objections, unresolved problems, alternative interpretations, and external criticism are not regarded as peripheral to the project but as essential to its maturation.

 

Where no satisfactory answer currently exists, the scientifically appropriate classification is:

 

Open Question.

 

CURRENT RESEARCH PRIORITIES

 

The present development of the Theory of Objectivity is concentrated on five interconnected objectives.

 

Formalization

 

To express the axioms, definitions, and derived propositions in increasingly precise logical and mathematical language.

 

Derivation

 

To identify which propositions actually follow from the axiomatic system and under what assumptions.

 

Physical Correspondence

 

To determine which concepts of the ontological model can be associated with physically meaningful variables or structures.

 

Prediction

 

To formulate quantitative and discriminating consequences.

 

Independent Examination

 

To make arguments, models, data, and predictions sufficiently explicit to permit external researchers to criticize, reproduce, or reject them.

 

This sequence may be summarized as:

 

Axiom → Derivation → Model → Prediction → Test → Criticism

 

A RESEARCH PROGRAM IN DEVELOPMENT

 

The Theory of Objectivity should be understood as an evolving research program.

 

Its purpose is not merely to provide another descriptive narrative of the universe.

 

Its more demanding objective is to investigate whether a limited set of logically fundamental propositions can generate a coherent chain connecting ontology, geometry, physical structure, cosmology, information, and measurable reality.

 

Accordingly, the development of TO requires both constructive and critical work.

 

A proposition may be logically interesting without being physically realized.

 

A model may be mathematically coherent without being experimentally correct.

 

An experiment may be compatible with TO without confirming it.

 

A physical interpretation becomes scientifically stronger only when it generates consequences that can be independently examined and, in principle, contradicted.

 

This distinction guides the current stage of the project.

 

PUBLICATIONS AND RESEARCH RECORD

 

The Theory of Objectivity has been developed through foundational texts, subsequent theoretical publications, scientific dialogues, and studies confronting its propositions with developments in physics, cosmology, quantum theory, and related fields.

 

The website organizes this material into:

 

Foundational Bibliography

 

The works establishing the original conceptual structure of TO.

 

Recent TO Publications

 

Later developments, reformulations, and extensions of the theory.

 

Scientific Dialogues

 

Studies comparing TO with experimental and theoretical literature.

 

Technical Documents

 

Formal definitions, mathematical developments, models, appendices, code, and research material.

 

Repositories and DOIs

 

Persistent records allowing readers to identify and consult specific versions of the published work.

 

The maintenance of a transparent version history is intended to make it possible to distinguish earlier formulations from subsequent refinements.

 

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

 

Artificial intelligence systems may be used within the Theory of Objectivity project as tools for analytical support.

 

Their functions may include literature organization, comparative analysis, logical criticism, textual revision, exploration of mathematical formulations, and structured dialogue with existing scientific literature.

 

Such use does not transfer authorship or scientific responsibility to the artificial intelligence system.

 

The authors remain responsible for the theoretical propositions, interpretations, arguments, publications, and conclusions presented under their names.

 

AI-generated or AI-assisted analysis must therefore be understood as methodological support rather than as independent validation of the theory.

 

AUTHORS

 

The Theory of Objectivity is developed by:

 

Vidamor Cabannas

 

and

 

Denivaldo Silva

 

as an independent research program concerned with the logical, ontological, mathematical, physical, and cosmological foundations of existence.

 

THE CENTRAL CHALLENGE

 

The ultimate scientific question facing the Theory of Objectivity is not whether its concepts can be associated retrospectively with many known phenomena.

 

It is whether its foundational principles can produce new, precise, independently examinable consequences.

 

The project therefore moves toward a demanding objective:

 

to transform logical propositions into formal derivations;

 

formal derivations into physical models;

 

physical models into quantitative predictions;

 

and

 

quantitative predictions into tests that reality itself can answer.

 

That is the research path proposed by the Theory of Objectivity.

 

THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY

 

From Logical Necessity to Physical Possibility

 

Axioms · Derivations · Models · Predictions · Tests · Criticism

 

[EXPLORE THE THEORY]

 

[THE SEVEN ABSOLUTE TRUTHS]

 

[PREDICTIONS AND TESTS]

 

[PUBLICATIONS]

 

 

Previsões, critérios de falsificação, objeções, respostas e o status da pesquisa.

Publicações e canais de contato científico estão reunidos nas seções Publicações e Contato.

As versões históricas permanecem acessíveis, a versão atual está identificada e o histórico de mudanças documenta a evolução dos fundamentos e da formulação.

Uma revisão só é registrada quando altera a formulação, os axiomas ou as previsões, com critérios explícitos de comparação.

Leia os conceitos fundamentais e o método antes de examinar os axiomas e a formalização.